If you
were to map out your wandering thoughts. Race with it on the fastest machine
available to archive your dictations. What would fail you first. The inability
to translate the thought’s current destination to words, or the inability to
hurry the enunciation of words. What then would you do with such an archive?
Under what retirement circumstance would you need to use such a map?
Like
photographs taken on trip, revisited when one needs the image as a key into
another time and situation. Gradually, it fades into nostalgia. When the user
departs, and the heir to the documents can only guess what happened and whether
it actually mattered.
If such a
continuous mapping exercise existed, when then would the old become obsolete?
New maps generated over existing territories, burying the previous under newer
conclusions. If an old feature doesn’t translate onto the new mapping, has it
by choice ceased to be important or been confiscated by the parasite of time
and its feeding upon our memory?
Even
photographs cannot preserve it. As a plant that needs constant watering and
care, if we neglect that memory for too long, it will not be around the next
time we return to it. Its original label still stuck in the crusted soil, but
nothing to substantiate it. A small thought that is not recorded is like a
wind-carried seed, passing by but never implanted. Some thoughts are heavier
than others and more hardy in variety. It might not prosper, and we might never
visit it again, but it is there, refusing to whither and unconsciously
affecting the ecosystem of our being.
No comments:
Post a Comment